Re: bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:27:45 +0100
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:54:07AM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote:
so I'm trying to use unionfs, cachefs and nfs, as cachefs is 2.6.18-rc5
right now, thats what I'm testing, but I hit an oops.
basically unionfs's lookup does a "lookup_one_len()" on the underlying fs.
And there you have the bug already. unionfs must not do this, and given
the past discussion on this the unionfs developers should know that
very well :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?
- From: Shaya Potter
- bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?
- Prev by Date: Re: bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: rwlock.h fix smp alternatives fix
- Previous by thread: Re: bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?
- Next by thread: SDIO card support in Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|