Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:13:20 -0600
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 13:43, Matthew Garrett wrote:
That would be helpful. For the One Laptop Per Child project (or whatever
it's called today), it would be advantageous to run without acpi.
Out of curiosity, what is the motivation for running without acpi?
It costs a lot to diverge from the mainstream in areas like that,
so there must be a big payoff. But maybe if OLPC depends on acpi
being smarter about power or code size or whatever, those improvements
could be made and everybody would benefit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: Oops while reading netdev stats from /proc/
- Next by Date: [Patch] Uninitialized variable in drivers/net/wan/syncppp.c
- Previous by thread: Re: Oops while reading netdev stats from /proc/
- Next by thread: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
