Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 02:04:04 -0700
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:56:19 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 20:46 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
* ktime_t definitions when using the 64-bit scalar representation:
@@ -73,6 +74,10 @@ typedef union {
*/
static inline ktime_t ktime_set(const long secs, const unsigned long nsecs)
{
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
+ if (unlikely(secs >= KTIME_SEC_MAX))
+ return (ktime_t){ .tv64 = KTIME_MAX };
+#endif
return (ktime_t) { .tv64 = (s64)secs * NSEC_PER_SEC + (s64)nsecs };
}
This makes my FC3 x86_64 testbox hang during udev startup. sysrq-T trace at
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/log-x.
Does not help much.
I had a quick look at the args to hrtimer_nanosleep and all seems to be in
order.
Hmm. I can not reproduce that on any one of my boxen. Can you please try
with this debug variant, so we have a chance to figure out what's wrong.
With that patch the machine emits 88 bigabytes of stuff then locks up.
Something a little less aggressive is needed, methinks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- Prev by Date: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: pci error recovery procedure
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- Index(es):