Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:11:36 +0200
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 14:47, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:19:06AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Got it. i8259A_resume calls init_8259A(0) unconditionally, even if
auto_eoi has been set. Keep track of the current status and restore
that on resume. This fixes it for AMD64 and i386.
Patch looks okay to me...
Cool. Andi, does it look sane to you? I'm not really sure who to wave
8259 code at...
Yes. I already have it queued for .19 at least. Not sure it's critical enough
for .18, especially since it doesn't seem to be a regression.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- From: Matthew Garrett
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- References:
- io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
- From: Matthew Garrett
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- From: Matthew Garrett
- io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: calling kernel syscall manually
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
