Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: daw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David Wagner)
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:35:21 +0000 (UTC)
linux-os \(*** Johnson\) wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, David Wagner wrote:
Just because it is a bug in tar doesn't mean that Linux developers have
to create their tarfile in a way that tickles the bug. Two wrongs don't
make a right.
It's not a tar bug, [...]
You misunderstand my point. I don't care whether it is a tar bug or not.
I'm not claiming it is a tar bug. I'm saying that people on those threads
claimed that this is a tar bug and used that as an excuse to do nothing
about the problem of world-writeable files in the Linux tar archive.
I'm saying that's a lousy excuse. What I'm saying is that, even if we
accept that it is a tar bug, that's not a good excuse for doing nothing
about the problem. Of course, if it is not a tar bug, then that makes
it an even weaker excuse.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: Rene Scharfe
- Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- References:
- Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: Kyle Moffett
- Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: David Wagner
- Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: linux-os \(*** Johnson\)
- Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] MMIO accessors & barriers documentation
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- Previous by thread: Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- Next by thread: Re: R: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- Index(es):