Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity

From: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:31:05 +0200

On Fri, 22 September 2006 12:11:40 +0100, David Howells wrote:

bool "Provide AFS client caching support"

(EXPERIMENTAL) ?

- depends on AFS_FS && FSCACHE && EXPERIMENTAL
Say Y here if you want AFS data to be cached locally on through the

disk ?

At least I cannot see why the AFS patch differs from the NFS one in
those two details.

Jörn

--
More computing sins are committed in the name of efficiency (without
necessarily achieving it) than for any other single reason - including
blind stupidity.
-- W. A. Wulf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] NFS: Manage NFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
  - From: David Howells
- [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: [PATCH] 2.6.18: access permission filesystem 0.19
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread