Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:47:54 -0400
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 00:33 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
the main goals for 2.6.16 are:
- no regressions
- security fixes
And I did always say that things like adding new PCI IDs are
considered
OK for 2.6.16.
I think the point that people are trying to make is that adding new PCI
IDs carries an inherent risk of regression. Unless you have access to
every device with that ID for regression testing it could be the
difference between a machine where one device doesn't work and a machine
that locks up hard.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- References:
- Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- From: Greg KH
- Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- From: Greg KH
- Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- From: Jean Delvare
- Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3 -repost] pmc551 whitespace cleanup
- Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|