Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:59 +0200
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 05:42, Aubrey wrote:
So, in the kernel space, there is always one bit in the IPEND register
is set. And if there comes a timer interrupt event, in the timer
interrupt handler, there should be two bits set in the IPEND register.
Therefore, schedule happens in the return_from_int.
So, I still say there is no latency here.
Well, if that's true, you should change your idle function not to
explicitly call schedule().
I haven't really understood how you preempt the idle task, but
I guess you can simplify the standard
| while (1) {
| while (!need_resched())
| asm("idle");
| schedule();
| }
to
| while (1)
| asm("idle");
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
- From: Luke Yang
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
- From: Aubrey
- [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
- Prev by Date: [PATCH][DOC] Fix kerneldoc comments in mm/vmalloc.c
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
- Index(es):