Re: [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support



On Tuesday 26 September 2006 22:23, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:15:08PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

The x86[-64] PCI domain effort needs to be restarted, because we've got
machines out in the field that need this in order for some devices to
work.

RHEL is shipping it now, apparently without any problems.

The 'pciseg' branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git pciseg

So are the NUMA issues now taken care of properly?

I assume IBM would have complained if it was broken in RHEL.

But iirc Summit has two BIOS options for this. Maybe they just recommend
to set the other one for Linux. Anyways I guess that can be all figured
out once the patch is in tree.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support
    ... The x86PCI domain effort needs to be restarted, ... machines out in the field that need this in order for some devices to ... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [PATCH] x86[-64] PCI domain support
    ... The x86PCI domain effort needs to be restarted, ... machines out in the field that need this in order for some devices to ... So are the NUMA issues now taken care of properly? ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • RE: Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
    ... What you pay for is the patches and support you get over RHN. ... The media alone ... just _not_ take advantage of support or updates for those machines? ... trial of RHEL and continue using it legally even after the trial is ...
    (RedHat)
  • Revisiting an old topic: licensing/titlement and "redistribution"
    ... just _not_ take advantage of support or updates for those machines? ... trial of RHEL and continue using it legally even after the trial is ... you can continue to use a paid-for installation of RHEL ... after the entitlement has run out. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
    ... add-ons on the enterprise OSes, if you are in a fast moving enterprise environment RHEL won't work. ... enterprise environments, but most would argue there you should probably lock everything down so tight that few kernel updates/userspace are even required for anything, the problem is in an environment were you are constantly having to bring in new hardware that does not work on the older release, where you cannot wait 6 months for RHEL to catch up. ... You typically bring in around a large enough set of new machines at a time any only update the pieces required to support that new machine, and then you run some test to validate that it gives the correct answers for various jobs. ...
    (Fedora)