Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:59:35 +0100
Ar Gwe, 2006-09-29 am 17:48 +1000, ysgrifennodd tridge@xxxxxxxxx:
I'm also a strong proponent of "authors rights", and I would consider
it very nasty if someone took one of my projects and decided to fork
it to be GPLv2 only, deliberately going against my intention. They
might have a legal right to do so but it would clearly be against my
wishes. I'm not even 100% certain it would be legal.
In the FSF case the reverse is more likely - the FSF uses its copyright
assignments to re-version a piece of software they own the rights to.
That I think is self-curing because people will contribute to the forked
tree without giving the FSF assignments - which is authors rights 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: James Bottomley
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Neil Brown
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: James Bottomley
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: tridge
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rt1
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Reset file->f_op in snd_card_file_remove(). Take 2
- Previous by thread: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- Next by thread: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|