Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:37:37 -0700
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:19:46 +0100 Roger Gammans wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:11:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
I don't know if or where it is documented.
Well, I've spend a good chunk of time reading round this part of
the kernel's interfaces without spotting it so another note somewhere
can't help.
You can submit a patch for it.
If you don't, I'll put it in my todo queue.
If I find an approriate place to put such a note I'll add it and
submit a patch, but I'm not sure where to put it , atm.
Any suggestions?
Hm, I looked thru fs/bio.c and block/*.c and Documentation/Docbook/*.tmpl.
The best place that I see to put it right now is in
include/linux/bio.h, struct bio, field: bi_sector.
What do you think of that?
---
~Randy
GPL v0: http://www.glacierparkinc.com/GlacierParkLodge.htm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- References:
- fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: linux-kernel-owner
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans
- fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Prev by Date: Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Next by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
- Previous by thread: Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Next by thread: Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Index(es):