[patch 12/23] hrtimers: clean up callback tracking
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:58:31 -0000
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
reintroduce ktimers feature "optimized away" by the ktimers
review process: remove the curr_timer pointer from the cpu-base
and use the hrtimer state.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
--
include/linux/hrtimer.h | 1 -
kernel/hrtimer.c | 10 +---------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm2/include/linux/hrtimer.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm2.orig/include/linux/hrtimer.h 2006-09-30 01:41:17.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm2/include/linux/hrtimer.h 2006-09-30 01:41:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ struct hrtimer_cpu_base {
spinlock_t lock;
struct lock_class_key lock_key;
struct hrtimer_clock_base clock_base[HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES];
- struct hrtimer *curr_timer;
};
/*
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm2/kernel/hrtimer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm2.orig/kernel/hrtimer.c 2006-09-30 01:41:17.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm2/kernel/hrtimer.c 2006-09-30 01:41:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -149,8 +149,6 @@ static void hrtimer_get_softirq_time(str
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#define set_curr_timer(b, t) do { (b)->curr_timer = (t); } while (0)
-
/*
* We are using hashed locking: holding per_cpu(hrtimer_bases)[n].lock
* means that all timers which are tied to this base via timer->base are
@@ -204,7 +202,7 @@ switch_hrtimer_base(struct hrtimer *time
* completed. There is no conflict as we hold the lock until
* the timer is enqueued.
*/
- if (unlikely(base->cpu_base->curr_timer == timer))
+ if (unlikely(timer->state & HRTIMER_CALLBACK))
return base;
/* See the comment in lock_timer_base() */
@@ -218,8 +216,6 @@ switch_hrtimer_base(struct hrtimer *time
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
-#define set_curr_timer(b, t) do { } while (0)
-
static inline struct hrtimer_clock_base *
lock_hrtimer_base(const struct hrtimer *timer, unsigned long *flags)
{
@@ -643,7 +639,6 @@ static inline void run_hrtimer_queue(str
break;
fn = timer->function;
- set_curr_timer(cpu_base, timer);
__remove_hrtimer(timer, base, HRTIMER_CALLBACK);
spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_base->lock);
@@ -657,7 +652,6 @@ static inline void run_hrtimer_queue(str
enqueue_hrtimer(timer, base);
}
}
- set_curr_timer(cpu_base, NULL);
spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_base->lock);
}
@@ -844,8 +838,6 @@ static void migrate_hrtimers(int cpu)
spin_lock(&old_base->lock);
for (i = 0; i < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; i++) {
- BUG_ON(old_base->curr_timer);
-
migrate_hrtimer_list(&old_base->clock_base[i],
&new_base->clock_base[i]);
}
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch 00/23]
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- [patch 00/23]
- Prev by Date: [patch 22/23] dynticks: increase SLAB timeouts
- Next by Date: [patch 07/23] cleanup: uninline irq_enter() and move it into a function
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 22/23] dynticks: increase SLAB timeouts
- Next by thread: [patch 07/23] cleanup: uninline irq_enter() and move it into a function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
