Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:04:09 -0700
Matt wrote:
I would have thought so too, but it also appears to consistently reduce
time spent in the kernel.
Interesting. Thanks for the continuing good work.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction
- From: Matt Helsley
- [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
- From: Matt Helsley
- Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
- From: Paul Jackson
- Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
- From: Matt Helsley
- Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
- From: Paul Jackson
- Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
- From: Matt Helsley
- [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction
- Prev by Date: [patch 18/23] dynticks: i386 arch code
- Next by Date: [patch 15/23] high-res timers: core
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
- Next by thread: [RFC][PATCH 01/10] Task watchers v2 Task watchers v2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|