Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
- From: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:25:53 +0400
A benchmark
'postal -p 16 localhost list_of_1000_users'
56% of run time waits for flock_lock_file_wait;
Vmstat reports that 66% cpu is idle and vmstat bi+bo=3600 (far from
max).
Postfix server with FD_SETSIZE=2048 was used.
Similar results got for sendmail.
Wchan is counted by
while :; do
ps -o user,wchan=WIDE-WCHAN-COLUMN,comm;
sleep 1;
done | awk '/ postfix /{a[$2]++}END{for (i in a) print
a[i]"\t"i}'
If ext2 fs is used the Postal throughput is twice more and bi+bo by 50%
less while flock_lock_file_wait 60% still.
Is flock_lock_file_wait considered as a performance limiting waiting for
similar applications in smp?
Leonid
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
- From: Trond Myklebust
- Re: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
- Prev by Date: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- Next by Date: Do you want pretty virrgin ***?
- Previous by thread: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
- Next by thread: Re: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
- Index(es):