Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:03:45 +0200
Did you get to the bottom of this yet? It looks like you're right,
and I suggest a seqlock might be a good option.
It basically doesn't matter because nobody changes the time zone after boot.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU: Fix off by one when calculating register space
- Next by Date: Re: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
- Previous by thread: Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- Next by thread: Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
