Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates

From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:07:25 +0200

On Saturday 30 September 2006 10:43, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:

Hi Andi,

[resending with proper CC's].

Please apply this Calgary patchset. It fixes one bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203971, should
go to -stable as well) and makes several other updates all of which
are safe for 2.6.19. Each patch has a detailed description.

Merged thanks.

It would be good if you could use a less weird patch format in the future
though. In particular diffstat should be at the end and any other weird
metadata too. And the Subject shouldn't be wrapped.

Thanks,

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates
  - From: Muli Ben-Yehuda

References:
- [PATCH 0 of 4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates
  - From: Muli Ben-Yehuda

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.18-git] RTC class, Kconfig improvements
Next by Date: Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1 of 4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU: print PCI bus numbers in hex
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates
... It fixes one bug ... go to -stable as well) and makes several other updates
all of which ... It would be good if you could use a less weird patch format in the future
... (Linux-Kernel)
[PATCH 0 of 4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates
... Please apply this Calgary patchset. ... It fixes one bug ...
go to -stable as well) and makes several other updates all of which ... (Linux-Kernel)