Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
Did you get to the bottom of this yet? It looks like you're right,
and I suggest a seqlock might be a good option.
It basically doesn't matter because nobody changes the time zone after boot.
Then we need to change to comments to explain the situation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- From: Dong Feng
- Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- From: Dong Feng
- Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- From: Nick Piggin
- Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- From: Andi Kleen
- How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] include children count, in Threads: field present in /proc/<pid>/status (take-3)
- Next by Date: Re: get_user_pages() cache issues on ARM
- Previous by thread: Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- Next by thread: Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
