Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:38:18 +0200
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 12:15 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
- The liability for damages, where the manufacturer of a device mightThis seems silly to me. Sure, lasers and medical equipment is
be responsible in case of damage when he abandoned the prevention. This
applies to medical devices as well as to lasers, machine tools and many
more. Device manufacturers can not necessarily escape such liabilities
as it might be considered grossly negligent to hand out the prevention
key, even if the user signed an exemption from liability.
dangerous if used wrong. When such equipment is
controlled by software, then changing that software brings
huge responsibility. But it shouldn't be made impossible.
They can provide the key, with the warning that _using_ it
means you are on your own and take all responsibility.
This might be silly in your opinion, but it is simply the reality,
especially in the US, but also in Europe we have an increasing madness
in liability jurisdiction. Do you believe that any responsible corporate
lawyer will buy your "with a warning" argument when he is aware of
rulings stating the opposite ?
I talked to very reasonable corporate lawyers about this and they
provided enough prove, that I take this serious.
Your argument is logical and should reflect common sense, but reality is
different. If we could rely on common sense, we would not have this
discussion at all.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- References:
- GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: James Bottomley
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Michiel de Boer
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Neil Brown
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- From: Helge Hafting
- GPLv3 Position Statement
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] off-by-one in kernel command line option parsing
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-git9 wireless fixes break ipw2200 association to AP with WPA
- Previous by thread: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- Next by thread: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|