Re: 2.6.18-mm2
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:54:19 +0100
Ar Sad, 2006-09-30 am 10:26 -0500, ysgrifennodd James Bottomley:
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 23:50 +0000, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
+ if (!pdev->irq)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
Don't I remember that 0 is a valid IRQ on some platforms?
i.e. shouldn't this be
if (pdev->irq == NO_IRQ)
return -ENODEV;
NO_IRQ is gone. Everyone uses zero and Linus has declared that is how it
shall be.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.18-mm2
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2
- From: J.A. Magallón
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2
- From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2
- From: Frederik Deweerdt
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2
- From: James Bottomley
- 2.6.18-mm2
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG-lockdep and freeze (was: Arrr! Linux 2.6.18)
- Next by Date: Re: BUG-lockdep and freeze (was: Arrr! Linux 2.6.18)
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.18-mm2
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.18-mm2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|