Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:01:22 +0200
On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 13:42 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
Hello.
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Do you mean "execute with ld.so", or "execute with PROT_EXEC mmap"?/ wants to be able to mark more partitions as noexec,/.... and then execute from them!
that's what is bothering me most about all of this.
no what bothers me that on the one hand you want no execute from the
partition, and AT THE SAME TIME want stuff to execute from there (being
libraries or binaries, same thing to me). That duality feels strange to
me, I could understand if you wanted noexec to be MORE strict; I fail to
understand why you want it LESS strict!
What breaks?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/3] - Altix: Add initial ACPI IO support
- Next by Date: linux-2.6.18 (git 95f3ef...) on sparc64 fails to build
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/3] - Altix: Initial ACPI support - ROM shadowing.
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
