Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:45:26 -0700
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:20:00 +0200
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 00:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
+htlb-forget-rss-with-pt-sharing.patch
Which I didn't write. cc's added.
if it's ok to ignore RSS,
We'd prefer not to. But what's the alternative?
can we consider the shared pagetables for
normal pages patch?
Has been repeatedly considered, but Hugh keeps finding bugs in it.
It saves quite a bit of memory on even desktop
workloads as well as avoiding several (soft) pagefaults.
So.. what does RSS actually mean? Can we ignore it somewhat for
shared-readonly mappings ?
We'd prefer to go the other way, and implement RLIMIT_RSS wouldn't we?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- References:
- 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] watchdog/iTCO_wdt: fix bug related to gcc uninit warning
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|