Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:13:27 +0200 (MEST)
%p will do no such thing in the kernel. As for the difference... %x
might happen to work on some architectures (where sizeof(void
*)==sizeof(int)),
but it's not portable _and_ not right. %p is proper C for that...
Ah I see your point, but then again, %lx could have been used. Unless
there is some arch where sizeof(long) != sizeof(void *).
It's really too bad gcc bitches about %#p, because that's arguably The Right
Thing.
ack. Make a bug report perhaps?
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- References:
- [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- From: Al Viro
- Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- From: Jan Engelhardt
- Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- From: Al Viro
- Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Avoid PIT SMP lockups
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|