Re: Can context switches be faster?
- From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:23:29 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris Friesen wrote:
John Richard Moser wrote:
Linux ported onto the L4-Iguana microkernel is reported to be faster
than the monolith[1]; it's not like microkernels are faster, but the
L4-Iguana apparently just has super awesome context switching code:
Wombat's context-switching overheads as measured by lmbench on an
XScale processor are up to thirty times less than those of native
Linux, thanks to Wombat profiting from the implementation of fast
context switches in L4-embedded.
The Xscale is a fairly special beast, and it's context-switch times are
pretty slow by default.
Here are some context-switch times from lmbench on a modified 2.6.10
kernel. Times are in microseconds:
cpu clock speed context switch
pentium-M 1.8GHz 0.890
dual-Xeon 2GHz 7.430
Xscale 700MHz 108.2
dual 970FX 1.8GHz 5.850
ppc 7447 1GHz 1.720
Reducing the Xscale time by a factor of 30 would basically bring it into
line with the other uniprocessor machines.
That's a load more descriptive :D
0.890 uS, 0.556uS/cycle, that's barely 2 cycles you know. (Pentium M)
PPC performs similarly, 1 cycle should be about 1uS.
Chris
- --
We will enslave their women, eat their children and rape their
cattle!
-- Bosc, Evil alien overlord from the fifth dimension
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=pvD8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can context switches be faster?
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: Can context switches be faster?
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Can context switches be faster?
- References:
- Can context switches be faster?
- From: John Richard Moser
- Re: Can context switches be faster?
- From: Chris Friesen
- Can context switches be faster?
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc1 regression: unable to read dvd's
- Next by Date: Re: Userspace process may be able to DoS kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: Can context switches be faster?
- Next by thread: Re: Can context switches be faster?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|