Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:06:48 +0200
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 12:56:53PM +0100, David Johnson wrote:
On Friday 13 October 2006 11:58, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
PS: I hope you tested it also under internal stress (heavy
copying plus computing).
Yes, I did. No individual factor triggers the bug (high CPU load, lots of disk
activity, high network load, etc.) nor does any other combination of factors
other than what I mentioned before (high network load, some disk activity,
some CPU load).
Both scp and rsync trigger it reliably, but FTP does not trigger it at all. So
CPU load (which scp and rsync generates but FTP does not) must be a key part
of the equation...
Probably - but only with networking. So I'd try with this debugging
like in my first reply plus maybe 2.6.19-rc1 (e1000 - btw. I hope
this other tested card was different model - and locking improved)
and resend conclusions to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cheers,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- From: David Johnson
- Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- References:
- Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- From: Jarek Poplawski
- Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- From: David Johnson
- Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- From: Jarek Poplawski
- Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- From: David Johnson
- Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Generic platform device IDE driver
- Next by Date: [PATCH] HP mobile data protection system driver take 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- Next by thread: Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|