Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:25:32 -0700
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700
Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any
differently than out-of-tree other code.
I think what netdump was trying to do, provide a way to
requeue instead of fully drop the SKB, is quite reasonable.
Don't you think?
Netdump doesn't even exist in the current Fedora source rpm.
I think Dave dropped it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- From: Dave Jones
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- From: Stephen Hemminger
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- From: Stephen Hemminger
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cciss: disable dma prefetch for P600
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|