Re: scary message 'failed to recover some devices ... retrying' HPT370
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:22:46 +0000
Ar Maw, 2006-10-31 am 19:59 +0100, ysgrifennodd jurriaan:
ata11.00: ATA-6, max UDMA/100, 488397168 sectors: LBA48
ata11.00: ata11: dev 0 multi count 16
Found the master happily
ata11.01: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x1)
ata11: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
ata11.01: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x1)
ata11: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
ata11.01: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x1)
ata11: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
Slave probing is noisy and annoying right now because it tries too hard
but this fine (unless oyuhave a slave device)
Thanks for the report. I'll review the drive detect for the chip but I
suspect it just needs to switch to the polling probe.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 0/3: Fix EH problems in libsas and implement more error handling
- Next by Date: Re: Suspend to disk: do we HAVE to use swap?
- Previous by thread: scary message 'failed to recover some devices ... retrying' HPT370
- Next by thread: modpost warning: class mask
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
