Re: Thousands of interfaces
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:36:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:22:22 -0800
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:31:54 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Peter Hicks <peter.hicks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:25:50 +0000
[ Discussion belongs on netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, added to CC: ]
I have a dual 3GHz Xeon machine with a 2.4.21 kernel and thousands (15k+) of...
ipip tunnel interfaces. These are being used to tunnel traffic from remote
routers, over a private network, and handed off to a third party.
Is it possible to speed up creation of the interfaces? Currently it takes
around 24 hours. Is there are more efficient way to handle a very large
number of IP-IP tunnels? Would upgrading to a 2.6 kernel be of use?
2.4 has a several N^2 searches for interfaces (and is in deep freeze by now).
2.6 had several changes to handle 1000's of interfaces.
Oops I didn't notice this was with 2.4.x. Indeed, 2.4.x definitely
cannot handle large numbers of networking interfaces at all without
major surgery. 2.6.x should handle this significantly better.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Thousands of interfaces
- From: Peter Hicks
- Re: Thousands of interfaces
- From: David Miller
- Re: Thousands of interfaces
- From: Stephen Hemminger
- Thousands of interfaces
- Prev by Date: 2.6.19-rc[1-4]: boot fail with (lapic && on_battery)
- Next by Date: Re: feature-removal-schedule obsoletes
- Previous by thread: Re: Thousands of interfaces
- Next by thread: Re: Thousands of interfaces
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|