Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- From: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:59:51 -0800
Rusty Russell wrote:
Andi, the patches work against Andrew's tree, and he's merged them in
rc4-mm2. There are a few warnings to clean up, but it seems basically
sound.
At this point I our think time is better spent on beating those patches
up, rather than going back and figuring out why they don't work in your
tree.
This begs the question - should we rebase the paravirt-ops patchset against -rc4-mm2? I almost did it today, but didn't want to stomp on anybody else's toes.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- From: Zachary Amsden
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- From: Rusty Russell
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- Next by Date: Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
