Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:49:32 -0800
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:38:31 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: akpm@xxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:34:12 -0800
Subject: net: uninline xfrm_selector_match()
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Six callsites, huge.
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
You can't implement it like this :-)
xfrm_user.c is a bad place to put the uninlined version because
this can be built modular, whereas the callsites in places such
as xfrm_policy.c will be built statically into the kernel.
I would have found that out when I got around to compiling it ;)
Where should the out-of-line function be placed, or should I just drop it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
- From: David Miller
- Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
- References:
- Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
- From: David Miller
- Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] input: map BTN_FORWARD to button 2 in mousedev
- Next by Date: Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
- Previous by thread: Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
- Next by thread: Re: + net-uninline-xfrm_selector_match.patch added to -mm tree
- Index(es):