Re: UDP packets loss
- From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:35:31 -0800
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:15:47 +0200 (IST)
eli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,
I am running a client/server test app over IPOIB in which the client sends
a certain amount of data to the server. When the transmittion ends, the
server prints the bandwidth and how much data it received. I can see that
the server reports it received about 60% that the client sent. However,
when I look at the server's interface counters before and after the
transmittion, I see that it actually received all the data that the client
sent. This leads me to suspect that the networking layer somehow dropped
some of the data. One thing to not - the CPU is 100% busy at the receiver.
Could this be the reason (the machine I am using is 2 dual cores - 4
CPUs).
If receiver application can't keep up UDP drops packets. The counter
receive buffer errors (UDP_MIB_RCVBUFERRORS) is incremented.
Don't expect flow control or reliable delivery; it's a datagram service!
The secod question is how do I make the interrupts be srviced by all CPUs?
I tried through the procfs as described by IRQ-affinity.txt but I can set
the mask to 0F bu then I read back and see it is indeed 0f but after a few
seconds I see it back to 02 (which means only CPU1).
Most likely, the user level irq balance daemon (irqbalanced) is adjusting it?
One more thing - the device I am using is capable of generating MSIX
interrupts.
Look at device capabilities with:
lspci -vv
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP packets loss
- From: eli
- Re: UDP packets loss
- From: Auke Kok
- Re: UDP packets loss
- References:
- UDP packets loss
- From: eli
- UDP packets loss
- Prev by Date: Re: ACPI output/lcd/auxdisplay mess
- Next by Date: [PATCH] hfs_fill_super returns success even if no root inode
- Previous by thread: UDP packets loss
- Next by thread: Re: UDP packets loss
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|