Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:29:22 -0800
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:23:39 -0800, thockin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
BIOS handoff assumes an SMI, right? Could SMI be masked?
That might be a bad idea, because things like fans may be controlled
by SMM BIOS. The best thing we can do is to follow the published
procedure, and maybe insert a workaround if Sebastian can identify it.
-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- From: thockin
- Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- References:
- [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- From: Sebastian Kemper
- Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- From: Sebastian Kemper
- Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- From: Pete Zaitcev
- Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- From: thockin
- [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 15/36] I2C: convert i2c-dev to use struct device instead of struct class_device
- Next by Date: [PATCH 25/36] Driver core: add dev_archdata to struct device
- Previous by thread: Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- Next by thread: Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|