Re: [Patch] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: init fix for kdump
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:38:23 -0800
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:31:38 -0500 Douglas Gilbert wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:02:17 -0800 Sumant Patro wrote:
See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
Please include output of "diffstat -p1 -w70" so that we can easily see
the scope of the changes.
and see Documentation/CodingStyle for comments below:
diff -uprN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c 2006-12-28 09:56:04.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c 2006-12-29 05:31:48.000000000 -0800
@@ -779,6 +780,22 @@ megaraid_init_mbox(adapter_t *adapter)
goto out_release_regions;
}
+ // initialize the mutual exclusion lock for the mailbox
+ spin_lock_init(&raid_dev->mailbox_lock);
Linux uses /*...*/ C89-style comments, not // C99 comments.
Randy
It is about time this absurd stipulation was dropped.
Are there any C compilers that can compile the linux
kernel and that don't accept both _standard_ comment styles?
It's not a technical issue, it's just a style point.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [Patch] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: init fix for kdump
- From: Sumant Patro
- Re: [Patch] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: init fix for kdump
- From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: [Patch] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: init fix for kdump
- From: Douglas Gilbert
- [Patch] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: init fix for kdump
- Prev by Date: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux
- Next by Date: Should be [PATCH -mm] -- Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: init fix for kdump
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
- Index(es):