Re: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
- From: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 16:48:55 +0000
On Monday 01 January 2007 16:01, Ken Moffat wrote:
Hi, I've been running an athlon64 in 64-bit mode without problems,
up to and incluing 2.6.19.1. A couple of weeks ago I decided to use
it for testing x86 builds, since then it's been nothing but trouble
in 32-bit mode. It still works fine when I boot it in 64-bit mode.
Obviously papering over a severe bug, but why is it necessary for you to run a
32bit kernel to test 32bit userspace? If your 64bit kernel is stable, use the
IA32 emulation surely?
--
Cheers,
Alistair.
Final year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
- From: Ken Moffat
- Re: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
- References:
- x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
- From: Ken Moffat
- x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
- Prev by Date: Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all that again
- Next by Date: [BUG] panic 2.6.20-rc3 in nf_conntrack
- Previous by thread: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
- Next by thread: Re: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
- Index(es):