Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc3] qconf Search Dialog
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 04:13:49 +0100
On Friday 05 January 2007 11:44, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I would prefer it as separate smaller steps.
So one patch where you move the dialog and another where you improve
the search dialog.
Move the dialog from where, to where, and in what respect?
Move the Find entry to a separate menu and then add improvements on top of the
current find infrastructure and please don't just change the current
behaviour, give the user a choice.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 2.6.20-rc3] qconf Search Dialog
- From: Shlomi Fish
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc3] qconf Search Dialog
- From: Sam Ravnborg
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc3] qconf Search Dialog
- From: Shlomi Fish
- [PATCH 2.6.20-rc3] qconf Search Dialog
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:20
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc3 1/3] rtc-cmos driver
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc3] qconf Search Dialog
- Next by thread: PROBLEM: sata_sil24 lockups under heavy i/o
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
