RE: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
- From: "Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:53:39 -0800
-----Original Message-----
From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:47 PM
To: Lu, Yinghai
Cc: Linus Torvalds; Tobias Diedrich; Andrew Morton; Adrian Bunk; Andi
Kleen; Linux Kernel Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when
check_timer fails.
So that doesn't invalidate the generic test. I'm going to go dig
out what little information I have and see if I can stair at the
register definition.
Someone said we can that info about that reg in Kernel. And only
firmware can use that.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] All Transmeta CPUs have constant TSCs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
