Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:33:47 -0700
"Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@xxxxxxx> writes:
So that doesn't invalidate the generic test. I'm going to go dig
out what little information I have and see if I can stair at the
register definition.
Someone said we can that info about that reg in Kernel. And only
firmware can use that.
We can do all kinds of things when firmware gets it wrong, and in this
case I just want a deeper understanding. Once I understand that mess
I will decide what to do about it.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] update MMConfig patches w/915 support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation
- Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
- Next by thread: RE: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|