Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:31:48 +0200
Hello Andrew,
Can I do anything more in order to be closer to merge?
Some general comments... or should I CC other people etc...
I submitted this several times but got almost no architecture to ACK.
I just don't know how we can progress with this issue... All we wanted
is to break the 256 limit in x86...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On 1/22/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:23:26 +0000 Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:-
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> > Russell King wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:58:52PM +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > >> -static char command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE];
> > >> +static char __initdata command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE];
> > >
> > > Uninitialised data is placed in the BSS. Adding __initdata to BSS
> > > data causes grief.
> > >
> >
> > Static variables are implicitly initialized to zero. Does that also
> > count as initialization?
>
> No. As I say, they're placed in the BSS. The BSS is zeroed as part of
> the C runtime initialisation.
I don't understand the objection. With the above change, command_line[]
will end up consuming COMMAND_LINE_SIZE bytes of .data.init and will be
reliably initialized to all-zeros by the compiler (won't it?)
> If you want to place a variable in a specific section, it must be
> explicitly initialised. Eg,
>
> static char __initdata command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE] = "";
>
> However, there is a bigger question here: that is the tradeoff between
> making this variable part of the on-disk kernel image, but throw away
> the memory at runtime, or to leave it in the BSS where it will not be
> part of the on-disk kernel image, but will not be thrown away at
> runtime.
Yes, it'll take some space in vmlinux. We could perhaps create a new
__initbss to prevent that, I assume.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- References:
- [patch 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
- From: Bernhard Walle
- [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- From: Bernhard Walle
- Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- From: Russell King
- Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- From: Tomas Carnecky
- Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- From: Russell King
- Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- From: Andrew Morton
- [patch 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: fix UDMA/MWDMA/SWDMA masks
- Next by Date: RE: [PATCH] serial driver PMC MSP71xx, kernel linux-mips.git mast er
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|