[ot] Re: coding style and re-inventing the wheel way too many times
- From: Oleg Verych <olecom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
On 2006-12-21, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
[]
in any event, even *i* am not going to go near this kind of cleanup,
but is there anything actually worth doing about it? just curious.
Moscow wasn't built at once...
You may notice as some others are doing little by little steps:
- source cleanups;
- right dependancy;
- headers includes;
- warnings elimination;
- code reading-analyzing (brainwashing, as for me;) and a few line
fixes everywhere.
I think there are members here, who doing things, like that for at
least two years.
You are trying to focus (mostly) on style and sense -- ok. And maybe it's
like to be alone within a crowd. Anyways, as long as you fill, that you
can do that, and patches are accepded, changes are *documented* its ok,
also. Sometimes it's stupid, worthless or something else. If so, then
find more interesting things to do, unless you are going to proof
something to somebody ;E.
Here's, as i can see, almost no place for emotions, only technical stuff
and everything not far from it. See, there isn't any reply on you
message, except this one. I think, because of that.
--
-o--=O`C
#oo'L O
<___=E M
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc5: cp 18gb 18gb.2 = OOM killer, reproducible just like 2.16.19.2
- Next by Date: Re: configfs: return value for drop_item()/make_item()?
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 000 of 4] md: Introduction - Assorted bugfixes
- Next by thread: [PATCH] 9p: null terminate error strings for debug print
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
