Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
- From: David Moore <dcm@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:17:00 -0500
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 19:30 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
The problem isn't packets that are too big, the problem is we can get
unexpected / too many empty packets, which will then cause the DMA
engine to move on to the next descriptor before the payload buffer has
been completely filled.
I was under the impression that for an empty packet, the descriptor
wouldn't fire at all. Is that not correct?
-David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
- From: Kristian Høgsberg
- Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
- From: Pieter Palmers
- Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
- From: David Moore
- In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
- Prev by Date: [RFC PATCH -rt 1/2] RCU priority boosting that survives semi-vicious testing
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] init: support preset lpj value as config option
- Previous by thread: Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
- Next by thread: Re: In-tree version of new FireWire drivers available
- Index(es):