Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0



Hi!

Well, I do not think your kernel code is mergeable. But bits to enable
similar functionality in userspace probably would be mergeable.

You said it :-)

This patch exports to the user space the inactivity time (in msecs) of a given
input device. Example follows:

Looks okay to me. I guess you should sign it off, and ask Dmitry
(input maintainer) for a merge?


<0> $ cat /proc/bus/input/activity
0011 0001 0001 ab41 1
0011 0002 0008 0000 3160799
0011 0002 0008 7321 549991
0019 0000 0005 0000 3160799
0019 0000 0001 0000 3454901
0010 104d 0000 0000 3160799
0010 104d 0000 0000 2162833

The device ordering matches the /proc/bus/input/devices one, anyway I reported
also vendor, product, etc. Now the daemon is trivial...

@@ -482,6 +484,30 @@
return seq_open(file, &input_devices_seq_ops);
}

+static int input_activity_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+ struct input_dev *dev = container_of(v, struct input_dev, node);
+
+ seq_printf(seq, "%04x %04x %04x %04x\t%u\n",
+ dev->id.bustype, dev->id.vendor,
+ dev->id.product, dev->id.version,
+ jiffies_to_msecs((long) jiffies - (long) dev->last_activity));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct seq_operations input_activity_seq_ops = {
+ .start = input_devices_seq_start,
+ .next = input_devices_seq_next,
+ .stop = input_devices_seq_stop,
+ .show = input_activity_seq_show,
+};
+
+static int input_proc_activity_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+ return seq_open(file, &input_activity_seq_ops);
+}
+
static struct file_operations input_devices_fileops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = input_proc_devices_open,
@@ -491,6 +517,15 @@
.release = seq_release,
};

+static struct file_operations input_activity_fileops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .open = input_proc_activity_open,
+ .poll = input_proc_devices_poll,
+ .read = seq_read,
+ .llseek = seq_lseek,
+ .release = seq_release,
+};
+
static void *input_handlers_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
{
/* acquire lock here ... Yes, we do need locking, I knowi, I know... */
@@ -558,15 +593,23 @@
entry->owner = THIS_MODULE;
entry->proc_fops = &input_devices_fileops;

- entry = create_proc_entry("handlers", 0, proc_bus_input_dir);
+ entry = create_proc_entry("activity", 0, proc_bus_input_dir);
if (!entry)
goto fail2;

entry->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ entry->proc_fops = &input_activity_fileops;
+
+ entry = create_proc_entry("handlers", 0, proc_bus_input_dir);
+ if (!entry)
+ goto fail3;
+
+ entry->owner = THIS_MODULE;
entry->proc_fops = &input_handlers_fileops;

return 0;

+ fail3: remove_proc_entry("activity", proc_bus_input_dir);
fail2: remove_proc_entry("devices", proc_bus_input_dir);
fail1: remove_proc_entry("input", proc_bus);
return -ENOMEM;
diff -ur OLD/include/linux/input.h NEW/include/linux/input.h
--- OLD/include/linux/input.h 2007-01-26 16:59:38.000000000 +0100
+++ NEW/include/linux/input.h 2007-01-26 17:31:29.000000000 +0100
@@ -949,6 +949,8 @@
const char *uniq;
struct input_id id;

+ unsigned long last_activity;
+
unsigned long evbit[NBITS(EV_MAX)];
unsigned long keybit[NBITS(KEY_MAX)];
unsigned long relbit[NBITS(REL_MAX)];


--
I don't think anyone should write their autobiography until after they're
dead. - Samuel Goldwyn


--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/