Re: fs/ufs/inode.c:817: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:27:35 -0800
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:10:57 +0300 Tomasz Kvarsin wrote:
d binderman wrote:
Hello there,
I just tried to compile Linux kernel 2.6.19.2 with the
new GNU C compiler version 4.3 snapshot 20070126.
The compiler said
fs/ufs/inode.c:817: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
The source code is
for (i = 0; i < (UFS_NDADDR + UFS_NINDIR); i++)
ufs_inode->ui_u2.ui_addr.ui_db[i] = ufsi->i_u1.i_data[i];
but
./include/linux/ufs_fs.h: __fs32 ui_db[UFS_NDADDR];/*
0x28 data blocks */
./include/linux/ufs_fs.h: __fs64
ui_db[UFS_NDADDR]; /* 112: Direct disk blocks. */
and
__fs32 i_data[15];
and
#define UFS_NDADDR 12
#define UFS_NINDIR 3
so the kernel seems to be trying to write fifteen bytes into an array only
twelve
bytes in size. Suggest code rework.
As I see, linux-kernel is very high volume(noise?) list,
may better wil be resend to relevant mantainer(Andrew Morton?)
UFS doesn't have a known maintainer in the MAINTAINERS file.
The last big patcher of it is:
Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@xxxxxxx>
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: fs/ufs/inode.c:817: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
- From: Tomasz Kvarsin
- Re: fs/ufs/inode.c:817: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] barrier: a scalable synchonisation barrier
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix apparent typo of "CONFIG_MT_SMP".
- Previous by thread: Re: fs/ufs/inode.c:817: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
- Next by thread: BUG: soft lockup on 2.6.16-xenU kernel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|