Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 22:21:41 +0000
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 21:47:36 +0100 (MET)
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 3 2007 10:31, David Schwartz wrote:
The way out of the GPL problem is to make clear that it is *not* a
copyright enforcement scheme
So why do we have EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL then, if
Because if you go around modifying code to get around it then regardless
of the DMCA question you are actively doing it and there is very clear
intent to do other than the right holder intended. In some ways its the
difference between walking through an open archway into a private area
and kicking the door down to get in.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: Jon Masters
- Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- References:
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: David Schwartz
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: Jan Engelhardt
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- Prev by Date: Re: A CodingStyle suggestion
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
- Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- Index(es):