Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 00:05:53 +0000
Anyway. Are we doing this or not - the more I think about it, the more
I'm kinda "happy" to just leave things as they are. Yes, bad people will
continuing doing bad things no matter what we do. Do we really want to
change stuff just to work around obvious abuse? Alan?
Actually checking the ELF sections does make the loader more robust and
we need to fix up the off by one as well so I think so yes. When I
thought about this I was happy I'd have said yes without modules doing
GPL\0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: David Schwartz
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: Jan Engelhardt
- Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: Alan
- Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- From: Jon Masters
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: hid on PPC
- Next by Date: Re: A CodingStyle suggestion
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
