Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?

Hi Dmitry!

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:27 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Nigel,

On Friday 09 February 2007 21:05, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
[ 17.684475] Device driver serio0 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
[ 17.684724] Device driver serio1 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
[ 17.684874] Device driver psaux lacks bus and class support for being suspended or resumed.
[ 17.685015] Device driver serio2 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
[ 18.373576] Device driver serio3 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.
[ 18.375666] Device driver serio4 lacks bus and class support for being resumed.


You should probably only warn if driver does not have resume method - not
having suspend is quite valid if driver is able to restore state at resume
without explicitely saving anything at suspend time.

Can do. Will do :)

Nigel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/