Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:37:27 -0500
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On 2/15/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:v j wrote:
> So far I have heard nothing but, "if you don't contribute, screw you."
> All this is fine. Just say so. Make it black and white. Make it
It is black and white in copyright law and the GPL.
The /whole point/ of the GPL is to funnel contributions back.
Bzzzt. The whole point of the GPL is to "guarantee your freedom to
share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for
all its users."
No, that's the FSF marketing fluff you've been taught to recite.
In the context of the Linux kernel, I'm referring to the original reason why Linus chose the GPL for the Linux kernel.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Michael K. Edwards
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Trent Waddington
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- References:
- GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: v j
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Dave Jones
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: v j
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Theodore Tso
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: v j
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Michael K. Edwards
- GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- Next by Date: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- Next by thread: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|