Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: "Michael K. Edwards" <medwards.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:18:11 -0800
On 2/19/07, Trent Waddington <trent.waddington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Of course, now you're going to argue that there's no such thing as an
"incompatible license" or "mere aggregation" and that these are just
words that were made up for the GPL, so they can be ignored.. another
pointless semantic argument because it doesn't change the very simple
fact that you don't have any rights to copy the work unless you have a
license and you don't have a license if you fail to abide the
conditions of the license.
I don't have to argue these points, because they're obvious to anyone
who cares to do their own homework. Appellate court decisions _are_
the law, my friend; read 'em and weep.
Cheers,
- Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Trent Waddington
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- References:
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Trent Waddington
- RE: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Trent Waddington
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Michael K. Edwards
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Trent Waddington
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Michael K. Edwards
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- From: Trent Waddington
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 12/15] ide: make ide_hwif_t.ide_dma_host_on void
- Next by Date: Re: Serial related oops
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- Next by thread: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|