Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- From: Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:02:47 +0000
Would you use MD at all, taking in account the disks come from the
same batch and all? I hear these things about MD/RAID being pointless
when you use disks from the same brand/type/batch since they most
likely will break shortly after each other.
Well, for values of "shortly" in months in most cases. These are
consumer goods, I would not expect units with consecutive serial numbers
to fail separated by such a short time that you can't do a backup and/or
I've had them fail within days when using almost identical serial
numbers. Nowdays I just mix disk vendors on each array. End of problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- From: Patrick Ale
- Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
- Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- From: Michael-Luke Jones
- Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- From: Patrick Ale
- Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- From: Patrick Ale
- Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- From: Bill Davidsen
- [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] export device_rename
- Next by Date: Re: bug in kernel 2.6.21-rc1-git1: conventional floppy drive cannot be mounted without hanging up the whole system
- Previous by thread: Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID
- Next by thread: why is asm-parisc/ioctl.h subtly different from asm-generic/ioctl.h?
- Index(es):