Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:36:47 +0100
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 12:14 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Controversy is no reason to give in! Nevertheless, I think you're right
- I believe the XFS guys said they fixed the issue that had caused I/O
to be submitted post-freeze. Well, we'll see if it appears again, won't
we?
I get to be the guinea pig, right? :P Unfortunately I was sick for the
better part of the past few days and can only test all this stuff early
next week.
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Problem with freezable workqueues
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
- From: Johannes Berg
- Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
- From: Nigel Cunningham
- Problem with freezable workqueues
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
- Next by Date: Re: Wanted: simple, safe x86 stack overflow detection
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
- Next by thread: Re: Problem with freezable workqueues
- Index(es):