Re: fully honor vdso_enabled [i386, sh; x86_64?]
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:40:10 -0800
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:11:11 +0900
Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:31:20PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
This patch changes arch_setup_additonal_pages() to honor vdso_enabled.We didn't actually have the sysctl entry wired up on SH, but once that's
For i386 it also allows the option of a fixed addresss to avoid
fragmenting the address space. Compiles and runs on i386.
x86_64 [IA32 support] and sh maintainers also please comment.
done, this patch works fine there too.
Andrew, do you want a separate patch for the vdso_enabled sysctl or
is it more convenient through my git tree?
If it's an sh-only thing then through your tree is fine, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- fully honor vdso_enabled [i386, sh; x86_64?]
- From: John Reiser
- Re: fully honor vdso_enabled [i386, sh; x86_64?]
- From: Paul Mundt
- fully honor vdso_enabled [i386, sh; x86_64?]
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
- Next by Date: [PATCH] x86_64: shut up vm86(2)
- Previous by thread: Re: fully honor vdso_enabled [i386, sh; x86_64?]
- Next by thread: Re: fully honor vdso_enabled [i386, sh; x86_64?]
- Index(es):