Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 12:17:11 +0100
On Fri, Mar 02 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2007-03-01 11:45:35, Jeff Chua wrote:
On 3/1/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
with 2.6.20, pressing Fn/F4 generates an ACPI event and triggers suspend to RAM.
On 2.6.21-rc2, after resume (when the box is accessible from network),
pressing Fn/F4 again does not seem to have any effect.
I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume
from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the
changes to ACPI and test it?
As I said elsewhere in the thread, suspend/resume to RAM works ok on
my thinkpad x60. I posted my .config there, perhaps difference is in
it? Ingo identified KVM as possible culprit.
I'll try your .config for kicks, the problem that Ingo pin pointed is
not what is affecting me.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
- From: Jeff Chua
- Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with libata-pata, ATAPI DVD reader and a "copy-protected" audio cd
- Next by Date: [2.6.20] slab curruption
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|